Wednesday, October 8, 2008

Lighting Pt 2 (Fashion Photography): Theory Notes: Shooting in Sunlight

An example of Lens Flare. Shooting in direct sunlight can cause many problems. High contrast, blown out highlights, lens flare, and overly saturated colors can all reslt from shooting in the sun. Subjects can also squint while posing, whih causes for some lesser quality pictures. One way to solve these problems is to shoot in the shade, under a tree, for example. With portraits and other "portable" photos, this is the quicest solution. If moving the subject is not possible, however, you instead can move. This can give you better light, and a more interesting shot if you use a less "typical" angle. Another simple solution is to make your on shade. You can use your body, a cardboard sheet, an umbrella, or a reflector to do this. Using the sunlight to their advantage here, by having an ineteresting angle in their picture. Instead of taking away light, it is also possible to help solve these problems by adding light. You can use a fill-in flash to even out the subject's shadows. Even though it is more common to shoot with the sun behind you (the photgrapher), you can shoot into the sun for a nice shot, especially if you have a good fill-in flash. Another way to even out dark shadows is to use a reflector (similar to in low-light situations). A diagram showing how lens flare is caused. Lens Flare is an extremely common problem when shooting in direct sunlight. It is caused by "non image-forming light" entering the lens and hitting the film. It reflects between the lenses of the camera and refracts before hitting the film. Luckily, there is an easy way to combat this- a lens hood. This is an attachment that goes on the end of your camera which helps to block out the additional light that causes flare. Lens hoods come in a regular conical (lamp shade) shape, or in a petal (flower, tulip, etc.) shape. If you don't have one, it's easy enough to make your own out of cardboard, or just use your hand. A lens with and without a lens hood (shown here is a petal hood). Another way to reduce flare is in the composition of the photo. If you have something inbetween the camera and the light source (like the tree here), this can help reduce flare, even if that object doesn't appear in the image intself. This tree helps block the sunlight and therefore reduces flare. Also, you can use a filter to help shooting in direct sunlight. Use a polarizing filter or a Neutral Density (ND) filter. These both help to reduce the amount of light that gets into your pictures, which then gives you more control over your aperture and shutter speed. Polarizing flters can also affect the colors of the shot, which can be a bonus or a drawback depending on the effect you're going for. A picture shot with (Left) and without (Right) a Polarizing Filter. Metering in direct sunlight is also hard to do. You can either choose to spot-meter the main subject of the scene you're shooting, or you can alternatively choose a more neutrally lit part of the frame- hopefully then the darks and lights of the photo will turn out relativel well. You can also take multiple shots of the same scene with different metering and choose the best image later. Also, shooting at different times of day can affect your shot. Shooting around dawn and dusk (normally about an hour after dawn and before dusk) can give beatiful shots with nice colors of light, as well as a better angle of light for your purposes. Finally, if all else fails, use the bright sunlight against itself. Sillhouete shots can be gorgeous, and are easy to do in bright sunlight! Sources: http://www.cambridgeincolour.com/tutorials/lens-flare.htm http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lens_hood http://digital-photography-school.com/blog/how-to-shoot-in-direct-sunlight/ (Additional Images) http://www.dimagemaker.com/ktml2/images/uploads/photo/polar/b.jpg

Lighting Pt 2 (Fashion Photography): Image Bank

Toni Frissell (Antoinette Frissell-Bacon)was a photographer from New York known for her fashion, WWII, and portrait photography.Her fashion photographs are known for typically being taken outside, "emphasizing active women." She later worked for Sports Illustrated, one of the only women to do so, and also worked at Life Magazine. She died of Alzheimer's in 1988. I chose this picture because I loved the way that the water made the dress flow, and the whole image is very serene. The image spoke to me, I liked how dramatic it was, without being over the top. Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Toni_Frissell Jamie Nelson is a fashion photographer who works out of New York City. She shoots advertising campaings, billboards, and magazine editorials. I chose this image because I liked the way she displayed the shoes in an unconventional way. The model also seems to display the emotion of the shoes, what the product would make you feel if you buy them (whether this was intended or not). It's very simple, but dramatic. (There are more picture of hers on the link below) Sources: http://www.todayandtomorrow.net/wp-content/uploads/2007/11/jamie_nelson.jpg(image) http://www.jamienelson.com/ (biography) Steven Meisel is a very famous fashion photographer of today. He is the only cover photographer for Vogue Italia, and also shoots from American Vogue, Calvin Klein, Versace, Valentino, and many more designers. He also shoots all Prada Campaigns. He started out as a fashion illustrator, and took pictures of models as a hobby, since he didn't think he was good enough to do it professionally. Later, these models used his pictures in their portfolios, and Seventeen saw these and asked him to photograph for them. I chose this picture (shot for Prada) because it was very eye-catching. The colors are all very light, and the darkest hue is the model's lipstick and the suitcases, which are all very subtle. These function as the "highlights" of the picture, which I think works very well. The model also seems to convery the "personality" of the designer well, and I think it's a very effective ad campaign. Source: http://i76.photobucket.com/albums/j25/beebeep/steven%20meisel/prada_ss2006_sasha-pivovarova_006.jpg (image) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steven_Meisel

Lighting Pt 2 (Fashion Photography): Diary

Compared to the last project, this project was horrible. My negatives were all very badly lit, and I had a lot of trouble making them dark enough, light enough, and/or with enough contrast. When I was shooting with Tessa was especially frustrating because the 2nd light I was going to use broke immediately before I was going to use it. Also my compositions weren't very good, so I was struggling to get the pictures I needed. I should have reshot at the beginning, but I didn't think that they would turn out so badly. While developing my actual prints, I was very often frustrated. My times were already long for my print of Randal (the shoe print), and by the time I needed to double them, I was getting up to 400 seconds on a single print. As you can imagine, this was quite frustrating. However, once I got to the print of Tessa (clothing print), I started out with a test strip of 4 seconds going up, which was unheard of. I was ectsatic. I ended up with a final print at 68 seconds, but that was still much better than 400. It was nice having the dark rom fairly empty though. I was able to work at 2 enlargers simultaneously for a time, which sped up the process greatly. Also, at the very end of the project, I had the darkroom to myself. This was very relaxing and stress-free, since I didn't have to maneuver around other people's prints (and bodies). Overall, this project was quite stressful, but I learned some valuable lessons that will hopefully help me in the future.

Tuesday, October 7, 2008

Lighting Pt 2 (Fashion Photography): Printing Composition: Clothing Print

To start out with this picture, I used the same settings as the contact sheet, but after several test strips I reduced the time. Aperture: 5.6 Filter: 3 Time: 4-18 Then I continued adding time, leaving the other settings the same.

Aperture: 5.6 Filter: 3 Time: 25 + 5... Then I closed my aperture to 16 and took out the filter, then reduced the time.

Aperture: 16 Filter: 0 Time: 14 + 2... It was still too light, so I did another test strip at longer times.

Aperture: 16 Filter: 0 Time: 24-40 I then did a full print at 36 seconds with the different kind of paper, since I had been using the glossy paper.

Aperture: 16 Filter: 0 Time: 36 This was still too light, so I tried another print at 42 seconds.

Aperture: 16 Filter: 0 Time: 42

I then did another print at 42, but with an aperture of 11.

Aperture: 11

Filter: 0

Time: 42

Then I tried another print with an aperture of 8 to try to get some black in the picture. I had another print at at 42 seconds with an 8 aperture, but that was still too dark so I reduced the time.

Aperture: 8 Filter: 0 Time: 38

Then, instead of doing more failed full prints, I did a test strip to fidn the right time for these settings.

Aperture: 8 Filter: 0 Time: 20 + 2...

I then did a print at the highest time on the test strip, 34 seconds.

Aperture: 8 Filter: 0 Time: 34 I did my A3 print at these settings, with the time doubled to account for the size.

Aperture: 8 Filter: 0 Time: 68

Lighting Pt 2 (Fashion Photography): Printing Composition: Accesory Print

When starting on this print, I used the same settings as the contact sheet, but reduced the filter, since it didn't seem to be very grey. Aperture- 5.6 Filter- 2 Time- 60 I then took out the filter, since it left the image too grainy. Aperture- 5.6 Filter- 0 Time- 60

That test strip was too dark, so I did a test strip reducing the time.

Aperture- 5.6 Filter- 0 Time- 40 +4...

This was still too dark, so I did another test strip starting even lower.

Aperture- 5.6 Filter- 0 Time- 30-52

The image was too grey at this point, so instead of adding a filter I closed the aperture and did another test strip.

Aperture- 8 Filter- 0 Time- 32 +2...

I then tried a full print at 32.

Aperture- 5.6 Filter- 0 Time- 32

I then did a full print at 60 seconds to compare times.

Aperture- 5.6 Filter- 0 Time- 60

Then I tried for a happy medium and did a full print at 52 seconds.

Aperture- 5.6 Filter- 0 Time- 52Then I did an A3 print at 52 seconds. (aperture and filter the same)

Lighting Pt 2 (Fashion Photography): Printing Composition: Shoe Print

This is my contact sheet. The prints I chose have a black "x" in the corner. The leftmost picture was my shoe shot, the middle my accesory shot, and the right my clothing shot. Ap- 5.6 Filt- 3 Time- 60 I started out by working on my picture of Randal, my shoe shot. I began with the same settings as my contact sheet. Ap- 5.6 Filt- 3 Time- 60 This was too light, so I did a test strip with more time. Aperture- 5.6 Filter- 3 Time- 70-120

I continued adding more time, because it was still too light.

Aperture- 5.6 Filter- 3 Time- 120-220

180 looked good, so I tried a full print at 180 seconds.

Aperture- 5.6 Filter- 3 Time- 180

I then started working on my A3 print. I tried a full print at 320 (double the previous settings), but it was still too light, so I started doing test strips of the A3 paper.

Aperture- 5.6 Filter- 3 Time- 360

I then closed my aperture and raised my filter to try to filter out the grey. I tried reducing my time, but forgot to do the last 3 seconds of 300, so ended up with 297.

Aperture- 8 Filter- 5 Time- 297

I then did another test strip at higher times, since the previous was too dark.

Aperture- 8 Filter- 5 Time- 300 + 20...

I then tried opening my aperture again to 5.6 and reduced the time. (I forgot the 3 seconds again here).

Aperture- 5.6 Filter- 5 Time- 297

My final print was at 5.6 aperture, 5 filter, 215 seconds.